Pulmonary TB Can Be Cured with Shorter Treatment, Study Finds

By | November 6, 2018

By Laura Kurtzman

 

Almost half of the nearly 10 million patients with active tuberculosis each year could potentially be cured with significantly shorter treatments than current guidelines recommend, a new analysis from UC San Francisco has found. The results suggest targeted therapies could be more effective in treating TB, which killed an estimated 1.3 million people around the world last year.

The new study, published Nov. 5, 2018 in Nature Medicine, re-analyzed data from three pivotal TB trials that had failed to show the efficacy of four-month treatments over the standard six-month treatment duration. The new analysis was led by Marjorie Imperial, a graduate student in the Pharmaceutical Sciences and Pharmacogenomicsprogram at UCSF, with publicly available data from the Platform for Aggregation of Clinical TB Studies.

The UCSF scientists said the reason the earlier trials failed was because they treated all patients the same, regardless of the severity of their disease. In the new analysis, when patients were retrospectively stratified into minimal, moderate and severe disease categories, the four-month drug regimens turned out to have been highly effective for the 47 percent of patients with minimal disease. But the four-month regimens were not effective for patients with moderate or severe disease. And even the standard six-month treatment was insufficient for those with the most extensive disease.

“Our study shows a stratified medicine approach can be feasibly applied to achieve treatment shortening for many patients with TB,” said Payam Nahid, MD, MPH, professor of medicine in the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care at UCSF School of Medicine, and one of the first authors of the paper. “A one-size-fits-all approach leads to undertreatment of patients with severe forms of disease, and overtreatment, with the potential that the drugs will cause harm, for patients who have less extensive disease.”

The study also challenges the assumption, built into both U.S. and international treatment guidelines, that TB patients can safely miss occasional doses of medication, as missing just one in 10 doses was found to have resulted in a fivefold greater risk of treatment failure.

“People thought it was OK to miss some doses,” said Rada Savic, PhD, associate professor of bioengineering and therapeutic sciences at the UCSF School of Pharmacy, and the senior author of the study. “But it’s not OK to miss even one out of 10 doses.”

TB has been treatable with antibiotics since the discovery of streptomycin in 1943, although the bacteria that causes the disease quickly developed resistance to the drug, which was used alone. New, highly effective rifampin-based combination regimens were developed in the 1970s and 80s, but resistance has arisen once again, a dangerous development given how common the disease has become. Alarmingly,  TB now kills more people than any other infectious disease, surpassing HIV/AIDS in mortality.

The researchers said a targeted approach to treatment based on their findings could be applied even in resource-limited settings where the epidemic is spreading the fastest, since the risk stratification relies on clinical markers that are already available in TB programs. They said that new markers could also be identified to enable a tailored treatment approach for patients with drug-resistant TB, which requires taking drugs for up to two years that can have severe side effects.

“You can imagine how profound the change would be for patients with drug-resistant TB if they didn’t have to take toxic drugs any longer than necessary,” Savic said. “The best strategy for improving TB therapy is to have shorter treatment durations.”

Authors: Other authors of the paper include Patrick Phillips, of UCSF; Geraint Davies, of the University of Liverpool; Katherine Fielding, of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Debra Hanna, of Critical Path Institute; David Hermann, of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; Robert Wallis, of the Aurum Institute; John Johnson, of Case Western Reserve University; and Christian Lienhardt, of the World Health Organization.

Funding: World Health Organization, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; National Institutes of Health, NIAID (1R01AI104589).

Disclosures: None.

UC San Francisco (UCSF) is a leading university dedicated to promoting health worldwide through advanced biomedical research, graduate-level education in the life sciences and health professions, and excellence in patient care. It includes top-ranked graduate schools of dentistry, medicine, nursing and pharmacy; a graduate division with nationally renowned programs in basic, biomedical, translational and population sciences; and a preeminent biomedical research enterprise. It also includes UCSF Health, which comprises three top-ranked hospitals – UCSF Medical Center and UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospitals in San Francisco and Oakland – as well as Langley Porter Psychiatric Hospital and Clinics, UCSF Benioff Children’s Physicians and the UCSF Faculty Practice. UCSF Health has affiliations with hospitals and health organizations throughout the Bay Area. UCSF faculty also provide all physician care at the public Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, and the SF VA Medical Center. The UCSF Fresno Medical Education Program is a major branch of the University of California, San Francisco’s School of Medicine.

 

 


Healthcanal.com